n0dalus wrote: > Trac looks interesting, but the demo there seems a bit messy.
The demo has write access for anonymous users, so yes. Look at the Trac project's own ticket system instead. Perhaps try one of these URLs. http://projects.edgewall.com/trac/report http://projects.edgewall.com/trac/search http://projects.edgewall.com/trac/browser/trunk http://projects.edgewall.com/trac/log/trunk Or a couple of the weirder ones: automatic timeline - http://projects.edgewall.com/trac/timeline?daysback=14&milestone=on&ticket=on&changeset=on automatic changelog generation - http://projects.edgewall.com/trac/log/trunk?format=changelog I'll agree any day that Trac has less features than Bugzilla. I just think that extending Trac with any features needed is a lot easier than making Bugzilla remotely usable :-). > Unfortunately it uses SQLite, which may not be able to effectively > handle the huge needs of wine's bug tracking. It says they will try > implement support for other sql servers in later versions, but > currently it doesn't. Bull... There are commercial products out there that handle millions of records of data per hour running on SQLite. I can't quite imagine what you're afraid of.