Petr Tesarik wrote:
Hi,

this patch fixes a bug in winedbg, which caused it to continue
execution at a wrong address when stepping over a function call.
The trouble was that if there was no breakpoint found, the code at the
end of break_should_continue reversed the PC adjustment and later the
debugger resumed program execution AFTER the INT3 instruction, which
is clearly wrong.

Index: break.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/wine/programs/winedbg/break.c,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -r1.17 break.c
--- break.c     27 Jan 2006 15:22:15 -0000      1.17
+++ break.c     21 Mar 2006 10:36:07 -0000
@@ -731,9 +731,13 @@
     if (code == EXCEPTION_BREAKPOINT)
         addr->Offset += be_cpu->adjust_pc_for_break(&dbg_context, TRUE);
+ dbg_curr_thread->stopped_xpoint = find_xpoint(addr, be_xpoint_break);
     dbg_curr_process->bp[0].enabled = FALSE;  /* disable the step-over 
breakpoint */
- dbg_curr_thread->stopped_xpoint = find_xpoint(addr, be_xpoint_break);
this part looks correct

+    /* Unconditionally stop on the step-over breakpoint */
+    if (dbg_curr_thread->stopped_xpoint == 0)
+           return FALSE;
+
but this doesn't... you don't handle the count here...
what you should do is only compute dbg_curr_thread->stopped_xpoint (and do the appropriate handling) when its current value is -1 (not found)

A+
--
Eric Pouech



Reply via email to