That being the case, why not clear up the name? Call the list [EMAIL PROTECTED] This makes clear it is for the ppc version, not the Intel version. The currently proposed name makes me think that the project refers to both Intel and PPC.
Dave --- Jim White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joshua Root wrote: > > > C.W. Betts wrote: > > > >>If you could have it so that wine-macos is > instantly sent to > >>darwine-devel, and vice-versa. > > > > That seems rather redundant. Might as well just > migrate all the > > darwine-devel subscribers over to wine-macos and > discontinue the former, > > rather than have two lists with the same content. > > I'll repeat myself, because the message still is > getting missed. > > The goal of the Darwine Project is to run Wine on > *PowerPC* Mac OS X. > > We know that is definitely *not* the goal of WineHQ > because Wine Is Not > an Emulator. > > The point of this wine-macos @ WineHQ discussion is > because Alexandre & > Jeremy want Wine development work for *Intel* Mac OS > X to be focused at > wine-devel, and I want darwine-devel to focus on > Wine + QEMU development > work for *PowerPC* Mac OS X. > > Jim White > > > > _______________________________________________ > Darwine-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darwine-devel > -- David Bialac [EMAIL PROTECTED]