That being the case, why not clear up the name?  Call
the list [EMAIL PROTECTED]  This makes clear it is for
the ppc version, not the Intel version.  The currently
proposed name makes me think that the project refers
to both Intel and PPC.

Dave

--- Jim White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Joshua Root wrote:
> 
> > C.W. Betts wrote:
> > 
> >>If you could have it so that wine-macos is
> instantly sent to 
> >>darwine-devel, and vice-versa.
> > 
> > That seems rather redundant. Might as well just
> migrate all the 
> > darwine-devel subscribers over to wine-macos and
> discontinue the former, 
> > rather than have two lists with the same content.
> 
> I'll repeat myself, because the message still is
> getting missed.
> 
> The goal of the Darwine Project is to run Wine on
> *PowerPC* Mac OS X.
> 
> We know that is definitely *not* the goal of WineHQ
> because Wine Is Not
> an Emulator.
> 
> The point of this wine-macos @ WineHQ discussion is
> because Alexandre &
> Jeremy want Wine development work for *Intel* Mac OS
> X to be focused at
> wine-devel, and I want darwine-devel to focus on
> Wine + QEMU development
> work for *PowerPC* Mac OS X.
> 
> Jim White
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Darwine-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darwine-devel
> 


--
David Bialac
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to