On Sunday 04 June 2006 11:45, Andrew Talbot wrote: > I am sorry to make such a meal of this
Don't be sorry. I like your persistence. > What I am saying is, because of all the checking code which follows, can we > be confident that every message->lpRecips[i].lpszAddress must have gained a > value, and therefore just write > > const char *address; > > for "address", without the empty-string initial assignment? I see what you mean now, yes address doesn't have to be initialised, there's no way it could be used uninitialised in this code. -Hans
