From: "EA Durbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: wine-devel@winehq.org
Subject: Re: FW: RE: My 1.0 wish list
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2006 12:12:18 -0500
I think i might actually see the problem. Let me test it.
In cond.tab.c the regexes are all wrong for matching the comparison
tests.
{ {'~','<','=',0}, COND_IGE },
This should be parsing as
{ {'~','>','=',0}, COND_IGE },
and
{ {'~','<',0}, COND_IGT },
we're matching a less than sign, so if it is matching the "<" it runs
COND_IGT it should be
{ {'~','>',0}, COND_IGT },
From: "EA Durbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: wine-devel@winehq.org
Subject: Re: FW: RE: My 1.0 wish list
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2006 11:59:25 -0500
Nice Catch!!!
But unfortunately no, it doesn't fix the problem, the test SELECT * FROM
TABLE WHERE testcondition >= testinteger is still returning the wrong
results.
are we using the case COND_ILE when we compare for greater than or equal
to? Or just when less than or equal to?
or does SELECT * FROM TABLE WHERE >= or > only call IGE or IGT?
From: Hans Leidekker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "EA Durbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: wine-devel@winehq.org
Subject: Re: FW: RE: My 1.0 wish list
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 11:29:49 +0200
On Sunday 04 June 2006 11:01, EA Durbin wrote:
> It shouldnt matter whether its >= or >, they both return the wrong
results
> in the actual msi installer and the right results in db.c.
Does this patch help?
-Hans
diff --git a/dlls/msi/cond.y b/dlls/msi/cond.y
index b32c417..47f858a 100644
--- a/dlls/msi/cond.y
+++ b/dlls/msi/cond.y
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ static INT compare_int( INT a, INT opera
return a >= b;
case COND_LE:
case COND_ILE:
- return a >= b;
+ return a <= b;
case COND_SS:
case COND_ISS:
return ( a & b ) ? 1 : 0;