On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Augusto Arcoverde da Rocha wrote: > Exists a opened bug report about the problem which this patch is suposed to > fix: > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5625 > > Can someone give some comments for what this pach wasn't applied?
As far as I can see the patch seems to assume that the $http_proxy environment variable simply contains the hostname of the proxy. But I believe that its format is more along the lines of 'http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]:port/', user and port being optional. There may also be a way to specify a password ('[EMAIL PROTECTED]'?). -- Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fgouget.free.fr/ War doesn't determine who's right. War determines who's left.
