Agreed, CVS is much easier to use in my own opinion, and the packages in the
ubuntu repository for git are old and don't function properly at all with
the instructions listed on the page, even when substituting git with http:.
The web interface to browse the CVS repository is also easier to navigate
than that of the git web interface.
From: Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: wine-devel@winehq.org
Subject: Re: LOSTWAGES: Replace references to CVS with Git
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:09:42 +0100
Mike McCormack wrote:
Index: templates/en/development.template
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/wine/lostwages/templates/en/development.template,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.6 development.template
--- templates/en/development.template 28 Oct 2005 16:05:10 -0000 1.6
+++ templates/en/development.template 18 Aug 2006 01:02:06 -0000
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
WineHQ hosts a number of services aiding the Wine development process.
<ul>
- <li><a href="{$root}/site/cvs">Wine CVS tree</a></li>
+ <li><a href="{$root}/site/git">Wine Git tree</a></li>
<li><a href="{$root}/site/contributing">Contributing to Wine</a></li>
<li><a href="http://bugs.winehq.org/";>Bug tracking</a></li>
<li><a href="http://appdb.winehq.org/";>Application Database</a></li>
I think we should leave the reference to the CVS tree page (but still add a
link to the Git tree). Some people find it easier to work with CVS than
Git.
--
Rob Shearman
