From: Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Saturday 23 September 2006 10:32, Scott Ritchie wrote: > Frankly, all we really need is for Alexandre to write a 10-second reply > to wine-devel for each patch he rejects. On WineConf, we decided against this. That would still slow down the overall patch submission speed. Consider you have a patch that's just fine, but before you sent that, I sent in ten patches with C++ style comments. Alexandre would now have to reply to ten patches with "No C++ style comments" before processing your patch. Everybody reading wine-patches could point out what was wrong with my patches.
How about emacs macros that would send "Patch rejected" or "Patch under consideration" to wine-patches or wine-devel ? This would get rid of the feeling that patches are dropping into a black hole while only costing Alexandre a fraction of a second per patch.
