Jakob Eriksson wrote:
Jan Zerebecki wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 12:04:40PM +0100, Robert Shearman wrote:
I appreciate your attempt at solving this hard problem, but I don't
believe this is the right approach. Using winsock2 instead of Unix
sockets adds overhead in terms of wineserver calls and extra
processing time to mangle arguments, which we shouldn't need.
But shouldn't we have the possibility to use winsock so a build
of our RPCRT4 is possible for native (and e.g. ros)?
Of course. In that case, the fix to add inet_ntop can go in
include/wine/port.h. Then if someone wants to patch rpcrt4 to
conditionally include winsock2.h instead of the Unix net headers and
call WSAStartup that would be fine.
Exactly my thoughts too, but I didn't dare voice them.
Why is that?
--
Rob Shearman
