Juan Lang wrote: >>Ignoring VT_ERROR just masks a previous error. > > > Hm.. are you sure? These are input arguments, not results. This isn't You can never be sure with this OLE stuff. My only experience with VT_ERROR stems from variant arithmetics and those functions didn't like VT_ERROR as input. Well except VarCmp when both input variants where VT_ERROR it would return "equal".
> the only app that gets further with this patch. See also bug 6166. > > I guess a test case is the only answer. Definitely. bye michael -- Michael Stefaniuc Tel.: +49-711-96437-199 Sr. Network Engineer Fax.: +49-711-96437-111 Red Hat GmbH Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hauptstaetterstr. 58 http://www.redhat.de/ D-70178 Stuttgart