H. Verbeet wrote: > On 03/10/06, Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I think we should get rid of d3d9.h (and ddraw.h), especially when >> looking forward to d3d10. That said, it took me approximately 6 weeks to >> get the > Yes, d3d10 would be my main concern for not including d3d9 headers, > aside from the fact that wined3d simply shouldn't depend on d3d7/8/9 > in any way.
I've tried sorting the headers out myself. It took a month and I ended up doing the whole tangle in one attempt (approx. 29,000 lines of code changed) but it's not like a patch of that size is going to be accepted :D
