On Friday 06 October 2006 10:19, Tim Schmidt wrote: > Again, works for me. I believe the only part missing for this case is > the simulation. Of course, there's the added possibility that apps > will go mucking about with data other apps care about, in which case a > per-executable simulated device would be best.
Wouldn't that break on Windows, too? If I have have two apps that muck about in my mbr, I expect them both to work, so they better do whatever they do in a sane way. I don't see how this would be different for a simulated drive. Cheers, Kai -- Kai Blin, <kai Dot blin At gmail Dot com> WorldForge developer http://www.worldforge.org/ Wine developer http://wiki.winehq.org/KaiBlin/ -- Will code for cotton.
pgpZWlG9OAh1p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
