Brad DeMorrow wrote: > Is Anyone currently working on this? > > If Not - I would like to start working on this part myself, it seems > like it > is fairly simple - but tedious work :-) > > Shouldn't be too much of a hassle and should help a little > > --Brad DeMorrow > > > On 9/28/06, Frank Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On 28.09.2006 15:26, Paul Vriens wrote: >> > I'll have a few hours tomorrow and will have a look. The cleanest >> > solution for now seems to create RegDeleteTree[A|W] in advapi32 and use >> > that wherever possible (unless we find that it forwards to shlwapi). >> > Most DLL's already import advapi32. >> >> Hmm... isn't advapi32 "lower level" than shlwapi? I'd expect that if >> forwarding takes place then it'd be shlwapi->advapi32. >> >> -f.r. >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Some Google searching provides that there may or may not be an implementation.
http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-svn/2005-August/005303.html ([ros-svn] [weiden] 17572: implemented RegDeleteTree() (untested!)) mentions this, and nothing more: --- CUT --- implemented RegDeleteTree() (untested!) Updated files: trunk/reactos/lib/advapi32/reg/reg.c --- CUT --- The code moved around in their tree a bit, it's actually trunk/reactos/dll/win32/advapi32/reg/reg.c, and you can view the code here: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/reactos/dll/win32/advapi32/reg/reg.c?view=markup -- The real problem with C++ for kernel modules is: the language just sucks. -- Linus Torvalds
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature