James Hawkins <truiken <at> gmail.com> writes:
> > However, the components could use a major revamping and should be > > fairly trivial. However I think that one component for each dll might > > be a bit much.. Maybe narrow the dll's down to categories such as > > wine-common-controls, and wine-riched.. > > > > No, we had vague components before, and they're not useful. Yeah, i use bugzilla for quite some time and from some components i still have no idea what they mean, and some are never used at all: *wine-console (i could guess, but i've never seen a bug with this component) *directx and directx-d3d. (ok , directx is more than d3d, but we already have components for dinput, dmusic etc. so why not remove directx) *wine-files (no idea what it means, no files ever seen with this component) *wine-gui (what does that mean?) *wine-ipc(never seen a bug with that component) *wine-multimedia (just change to winmm i'd say) *wine-ports (?) *wine-Rebar( could be moved to comctl32?) *wine- resources( (never seen a bug with that component) *wine-winelib ( (never seen a bug with that component)) My opininion is : please remove /change >We need a component per dll. Yeah, common dlls not yet added that come in my mind are urlmon, mshtml, shlwapi and advapi32. >I don't think we should add them all right now, > but when we have a bug report for a bug in a particular dll that isn't > a component yet, the component should be added (by request). >