On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 18:43 +0200, Stefan Dösinger wrote: > > Does anyone here know if the NVIDIA Windows drivers are still rigged > > with regards to the various 3DMark suite of benchmarks? There was a > > scandal a while back, and the company claimed to pull their special > > hacks out, but then they were caught again later doing the same thing. > > It'd be a shame if we were testing rigged Windows drivers vs unrigged > > Linux ones. > I think the windows driver has a huge game Database with per game > optimizations. I think I saw it in their control applet, you can even change > the settings. (I don't have a access to a Windows nvidia machine atm). > > Last I knew the Linux driver allows similar tuning. And if someone wants to > he > can write a specialized wine patch and put a per game hack collection > somewhere. I personally don't think theres anything wrong if nvidia provides > me with fine-tuned per game settings. Honestly I wouldn't put hundreds of > hacks into my own code, but if nvidia thinks they can manage that, ok with > me :-)
"Optimizations" aren't the issue here - hacks that break the application but still make the benchmark appear to render fine are. Here is an article discussing the issue: http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,3973,1086025,00.asp Essentially, they completely broke the rendering engine by hard-coding assumptions about where the camera would be into the driver. Move the camera slightly (such as in the developer version of 3D Mark), and everything is a garbled mess. This defeats the entire purpose of a benchmark as a real-application performance test, since the benchmark is converted from a simulation of real game rendering calculations to instead be a glorified movie. Thanks, Scott Ritchie