On 7/3/07, Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nick Dobrovolskiy confirmed that the version he sent me is their current development version rather than the version they used to ship Parallels 3.0. I think thats ok for us. Any objections?
I think we should make it clear to them that while they don't have to guy us the source, they have to give a copy of the buildable source or at least an offer to each person that gets a license. They really need to setup some sort of system to make sure that releases are tagged and if a user with a valid licenses wants a copy, they can get access to it. They are trying so we don't want to come off sounding unreasonable. -- Steven Edwards "There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world, and that is an idea whose time has come." - Victor Hugo
