Uwe wrote: >Gerald Pfeifer writes: > >> n is of type DWORD which is unsigned, so n < 0 always will >> evaluate to false. > > Is dropping the check the right answer? Shouldn't the check test for high > values like > 0xff00 and report a possible problem?
Indeed. IMHO we don't need patches like this, and Gerald is not thinking hard enough. Simplistic just-remove-the-warning patches are a Bad Thing, and we Don't Want To Encourage Them. Please stop. - Dan -- Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv
