Am Montag, 19. November 2007 21:19:08 schrieb Vijay Kiran Kamuju: > Why not having the functionality of d3dx in wined3d, instead of having > a separate d3dx library called wined3dx? > I like the having all the common functionality of d3drm,d3dx8, d3dx9_* > and d3dxof dlls at one place and for all the version dependent stuff, > we keep it the respective dlls. Because it is in a separate DLL in Windows. But it is an option to put it into wined3d.
Also, wined3d is quite huge. The stripped binary has 926 kb of plain code - no graphics, nothing. Also, it is preferable that d3dx* can run on Windows without wined3d. Having a wined3d.dll around is not a big deal as long as it works without actually using the low level d3d parts of wined3d. I am not opposed to put d3dx things into wined3d, but I think it is nicer to have it separate.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
