Jeremy White wrote: > Hi Paul, > >> Something we also have with the current tests is that the source files >> actually >> point to the correct version in CVS. I now see some strange links to refs on >> http://test.winehq.org/data/20080205/. > > Well, I'm afraid I'd argue that the current tests should be updated to point > to git...
And, putting my money where my mouth is, I've ostensibly fixed that now. The code supposedly can handle either git or cvs style revisions now (although detection is crude; if rev has a period, it's cvs :-/). Cheers, Jeremy
