On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:55:26AM -0600, Austin English wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:32 AM, TheBlunderbuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > marco wrote: > > > I can make a separate package of gecko
> > This sounds good to me, but lets not compartmentalize wine too much, > > like Debian. > > Who wants to find out that you need so many wine* packages in order to > > get something to work? > Agreed, but I don't think wine, wine-dev, and wine-gecko is too much, > especially considering that wine-gecko rarely changes... IMHO there should be a meta-package that is named wine which depends on everything wine, but which itself doesn't contain any files. That is also how it seems to have been done in the latest wine in debian, so it is no problem anymore that their wine is split up in many packages. But users who know what they do can still choose the subset they want. Jan
