"Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey, on that topic, there are also a bunch of other possible suspects: > > ./dlls/ntdll/tests/atom.c: memset(abi->Name, 0x55, 255 * sizeof(WCHAR)); > ./dlls/ntdll/tests/atom.c: memset(abi->Name, 0x55, > lstrlenW(testAtom1) * sizeof(WCHAR)); > ./dlls/user32/tests/menu.c: memset( bmfill, 0x55, sizeof( bmfill)); > ./dlls/ntoskrnl.exe/ntoskrnl.c: memset( &irp, 0x55, sizeof(irp) ); > ./tools/wrc/utils.c: memset(res, 0x55, size); > ./tools/widl/utils.c: memset(res, 0x55, size); > ./tools/wmc/utils.c: memset(res, 0x55, size); > ./server/object.c: if (ptr) memset( ptr, 0x55, size ); > ./server/window.c: memset( win, 0x55, sizeof(*win) + > win->nb_extra_bytes - 1 ); > > And 0xaa can also interfere:
Perhaps we could agree on a common constant to mark not initialized data in tests? I'd suggest to use 0xCC (standard debugging trick) for that purpose. -- Dmitry.
