On Wednesday March 5 2008 02:55:34 Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "L. Rahyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This problem was already solved in this patch [1] by Nigel Liang.
> > Unfortunately, it wasn't accepted and Nigel didn't tried to ask why it
> > was rejected or to resend it.
> > I think I will go ahead and resend his patch.
> >
> > [1] http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-October/044977.html
>
> MultiByteToWideChar is that patch passes negative length for the
> destination buffer which is incorrect.
That means patch "winecfg: Fix overflow in the DPI field at the
Graphics tab for DPI value bigger than 127" is incorrect too.
I think I will write today better patch myself from scratch for this
bug
(after reading some docs about MultiByteToWideChar).
After Austin's patch "Revert: winecfg raise max screen resolution to
160 DPI"
will be accepted I will send better fix for this bug (9715).
