On 3/24/08, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not sure why it wasn't applied the first time. Didn't receive any > comments on it. Anywho, in case it was accidently sent to /dev/null, > here it is again. Fixes bug 12095. > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12095 >
No patch attached. -- James Hawkins
