* On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > * "Saulius Krasuckas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > You still have not answered my question: how regression in question > > can be identified only by reading Wine code (at least in case of > > LoadStringA). > > I have no idea how the word 'only' has appeared in the sentence above,
I am sorry for my hurry, it's really unnecessary here. > and why it's not clear to you that reading Wine code is one of possible > ways to understand what the patchs does, and see possible improvements or > regressions caused by a patch. Or you know development methods which don't > require reading and understanding the code you are going to modify? Well, what I meant was if you haven't tested LoadStringA in Windows, then reading code won't help you to see a bug in it. Excuse me my English, if earlier msgs of mine didn't sound like that. Such is specifity (peculiarity) of any API translator, no? > I don't follow your logic here. Well, switching to private comm.