Hi Reece, thanks for looking into failures on Vista.
> To me, without understanding this in any more detail, it looks as if > Vista is broken here (and thus the Vista return parts should be marked > as broken()). However, Vista may be doing the right thing, and thus > the behaviour in these cases has changed between XP and Vista. The > latter seems more likely, but I do not have any experience in this > area, nor understand these tests well enough to say one way or the > other. I think you're probably right that Vista's changed. By definition, that makes it "right." I suspect what it's doing is guessing that something is base64-encoded even if it doesn't begin with the "-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----" or whatever header. It'd be interesting to see what format Vista guesses the encoded data was in when the encoded data have no header. I don't have access to a Vista machine myself, so it'd be hard for me to fix it. Would you mind having a go? Thanks, --Juan