Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've changed things a bit and resubmitted patch. Now there will be less > ifdefs.
Not much better I'm afraid. > I'm not sure which "data types" are you talking about, since I'll need > per-byte surface access in any case, and It doesn't look like it can be > wrapped into endianness-independant datatype. No, you shouldn't be accessing the surface per byte either, the access should depend on the format, i.e. for a 32-bit format you want to access DWORD by DWORD. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
