Dan Kegel wrote: > On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Zachary Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Its really ironic that you post this today as just yesterday I was >> contemplating the same thing, and not only doing a compile check but >> also a run of the test suite and valgrind. > > Yeah, that's the end goal. Gotta walk before you run, though. > >> Other than that I wanted to put in a +1 for sending an >> email to the author and to a status website. > > Yeah, I'll probably do that. I'll probably only send the email > in case of a failure; nobody needs extra email that just > tells them what they already knew (that their patch was perfect :-) > - Dan > > Depending on how bogged-down the robot gets (compiler cache will help), it might be useful to have a visible status somewhere so I know that my patch was at least checked before bothering Alexandre to commit it :)
Thanks, Scott Ritchie