James Hawkins wrote: > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 1:42 AM, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The !ret in: >> >> + else >> + { >> + ok(!ret && GetLastError() == CRYPT_E_EXISTS, >> + "expected CRYPT_E_EXISTS, got %d %08x\n", ret, GetLastError()); >> + } >> >> is superfluous. >> > > It is, but I'm sticking with precedent in leaving the original test in > place. Please remove wine-patches from the CC when you reply to a > patch. > Yeah, I think this is the first time I didn't pay attention to that, sorry.
-- Cheers, Paul.