James Hawkins wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Andrey Turkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I can't see any value in commented out test or sort-of-meaningless code >> comment. >> >> > > The tests serve as documentation of the API. In many cases, that > documentation is far superior to even msdn. Just because you know > that the implementation matches native doesn't mean that someone else > looking to work on the function knows that. He'll then waste time > figuring out what you already know. Ask yourself the opposite: what's > the harm in adding such documentation? > Non-misleading comment obviously cannot make any harm, and I can imagine one (unlikely but not impossible) case when comment can be helpful so yes, I'll add both commented out tests and sort-of-meaningless comment :) Hopefully nobody will object them.
Regards, Andrey
