On Friday 31 October 2008 13:39:36 Dan Kegel wrote: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 5:32 AM, Hans Leidekker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What happened to your /etc/hosts proposal? It has the > > advantage that we don't need changes to Wine source code. > > But the disadvantage that we need to know > which servers the test code is going to look up. > I guess I should change my patch to log the actual > name being looked up, then we can get a list. > Do we have any sort of policy about which hostnames > can be used during tests?
Yes, I think this could use a bit of standardization. Perhaps we could have a scheme like this: http.test.winehq.org ftp.test.winehq.org ldap.test.winehq.org pop3.test.winehq.org ... And mandate that networked tests use those. Then you would have a predictable list of hostnames to redirect. -Hans