On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Michael Stefaniuc wrote: [...] > > The fix for all these is to replace 'long' with 'LONG' which Wine keeps > > 32bit just like Windows (though I wonder if we should not use something > > lile 'wine_long' instead). > What would 'wine_long' gain us? LONG is already ugly enough.
The Windows SDK did not standardize on either long or LONG, instead they use a mixture (well, mostly LONG with some longs here and there). I don't know what their intention is with that, if they have one, it just bothers me to lose that information in the Wine headers. Just in case a few years down the road they decide that long extends to 128bits in Win128 but LONG does not. I don't want to have to convert back all our LONG-that-should-be-longs to something else again. It may be a bit paranoid, and maybe it's not worth it (though I don't think it costs us much). In any case, whatever Alexandre decides I'll follow. -- Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fgouget.free.fr/ It really galls me that most of the computer power in the world is wasted on screen savers. Chris Caldwell from the GIMPS project http://www.mersenne.org/prime.htm