Dan Kegel wrote: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Michael Pujos > <pujos.mich...@laposte.net> wrote: > >>> I don't see an attachment to >>> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-December/066224.html >>> or rather, there's only a zero-length one. >>> >> I just attached (In thunderbird) the file outputted by "git format-patch >> --keep-subject origin" >> Curiously the link above point to a zero length file but I received it >> correctly in my e-mail client from the mailing-list... >> > > That archive is a bit finicky. > I see the attachment in another archive: > http://marc.info/?l=wine-patches&m=122947592925831&w=2 > Suggestion: next time use a shorter filename, maybe that's > what screwed up the archive. > Ah ok, I've noticed it also happens with other patches posted
> It looks like you're changing the protocol. Will old clients be able to > connect successfully? It looks like they won't. you need to support > old clients. We're not allowed to break compatibility now that we've > released wine-1.0. > - Dan > The protocol is slightly changed between read_changes_apc() in ntdll and the server to support return of multiple FILE_NOTIFY_INFORMATION structs at a time. This is transparent to win32 programs (is that what you are calling client ? 'm still a bit new to wine terminology :). using this API (ReadDirectoryChangeW) and I took great care to have all the tests pass.