Hans Leidekker <h...@codeweavers.com> writes: > On Wednesday 14 January 2009 17:01:06 Juan Lang wrote: > >> + 704 stdcall @(wstr ptr) SHELL32_704 # GUIDFromStringW >> >> Out of curiosity, what's the reason for using SHELL32_704 as the name, >> instead of GUIDFromStringW? > > I just followed a pattern already there in shell32, I don't know the exact > rules that apply here, to be honest.
If there's a known official name you should use it, and most likely make it a -noname export. -- Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org
