On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Alexandre Julliard <julli...@winehq.org> wrote: > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <l...@lkcl.net> writes: > >> so - what do people think? would you agree that a user-space pipe >> "proxy" is an effective solution? > > No, you are on the wrong track. That solution is ugly, inefficient, and > it doesn't help anything since the wineserver constraints that you are > trying to avoid obviously apply just as well to your proxy process.
how would you envisage doing client-side SMB named pipes?