Ben Klein wrote: > [cut to conserve space and to get to the point] > appdb.winehq.org is for Wine application test data. If a user submits > test data that says "Garbage" in Wine, with an additional comment that > says "I was able to get this working in Crossover Office", I don't > have a problem. However, if the test data is entirely for Crossover, > or RecatOS, Cedega or WineX for that matter, it does not belong on > AppDB. > I agree with the use of the Wine Applications Database with these restrictions. I don't want to see products listed that do not conform to the same standards as Wine. > > "Rating: Garbage > What works: Installer > What doesn't work: Starting the game > What wasn't tested: N/A > Additional comments: This works in Crossover Games, but not in Wine" > ^^ I don't have a problem with this. (If it mentioned Cedega/WineX or > ReactOS, I'd probably remove the additional comment, but leave the > test data intact. CodeWeavers products are a special case :) ) > > I think this is the point. Crossover, yes. The rest of the stuff, no. And this is exactly what I was talking about. If it does not work in Wine, rating: Garbage, not Plat, Gold or Bronze.
James McKenzie
