On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Alexandre Julliard <julli...@winehq.org> wrote: > I don't think tests passing on Windows is a reason for a release, it has > very little impact on the Wine code. In the vast majority of cases these > are tests that already succeed on Wine and on some Windows versions, so > fixing them only involves making them less strict. That's not something > users care about. > > You could certainly make the argument that failing tests should block > the release, but that doesn't imply that succeeding tests justify a > release all by themselves.
I've been itching to do another release for a while, since what we have now is a lot better than 1.0. Your position has been that what's blocking release is the lack of a new feature (you listed several, any of which you felt would suffice). How do you feel now? Are we close to having any of those features, and/or are you willing to consider dropping that requirement? - Dan
