2009/3/16 Vitaliy Margolen <wine-de...@kievinfo.com>: > Ben Klein wrote: >> 2009/3/14 David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com>: >>> 2009/3/13 John Klehm <xixsimplicity...@gmail.com>: >>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:24 PM, David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Because the ideal way to deal with more malicious users without >>>>> hampering the good users is to give community members the power to do >>>>> the work, so it doesn't fall to just Dimi. >>>> I'd agree, but there doesn't seem to be a way to delete users from the >>>> web interface. Disabling them could be our best bet without some >>>> custom coding. >>> >>> Disabling will do. >> >> I'd think that disabling would be preferred to removing accounts, at >> least as a quick-fix if someone is identified as a spammer. I also >> think it's probably a bad idea to have too many SuperUsers :D > > I was asking about disabling of file attachments since they can not be > monitored for spam content. How did this deviate into disabling users?
Because someone started talking about spam-control methods.