On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Warren Dumortier <nwarre...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/4/10 Ben Klein <shackl...@gmail.com>: >> 2009/4/9 EA Durbin <ead1...@hotmail.com>: >>> After all we don't want to vastly increase our potential customer base and >>> potentially get several $70 per crossover professional license or $40 per >>> standard license fees, but rather wait until someone writes a hefty check to >>> port it up front. >> >> You're confusing Wine with Crossover. Wine does not have license fees. >> Wine does not ask for money if you want to use it, nor do Wine devs >> ask for money if you want things fixed. Wine devs typically ask for >> patches if you want things fixed. >> >> Wine also does not say "we need to get this app fixed because people >> demand it". The closest Wine comes to that is "we need to get these >> API calls because a bunch of apps use them and they're all breaking". >> >> >> > > You're all wrong, it's maybe not a matter of money or to have more > users, but to let it work for a lot of users for our current users > base. It's very annoying, and a lot of Wine users might need it ATM. A > lot of people have older iPods who are supported by some programs like > Amarok or Rhythmbox, but not for the latest generations... > > >
Sure, it'd be useful, but that doesn't make the resources to do it magically appear. For instance, I'd _really like_ for Rachel Bilson to pick me up and take me on a hot date tonight, but that doesn't mean it's going to magically happen.* -- -Austin *If you can make that happen, however, I'd be in your debt.