Hi, Apologies if you've already read this - I've been having trouble getting the message to go through.
I just had a play around with Tango-ifying Wine. The end result was quite pleasing. There aren't too many icons to deal with, so it's not a long job. All I've done here is swap out the shell32 icons, but I think the experience is definitely improved (see http://www.airwebreathe.org.uk/shell32.png ). Is it worth me submitting the patch? http://www.airwebreathe.org.uk/0001-Replaced-shell32-icons-with-Tango-icons.patch.txt I tried doing the same for user32 MessageBox icons, but the end result was less pleasing. These larger icons suffer from Wine's lack of alpha channel support when it comes to icon rendering. Semitransparent areas are rendered in black which looks yucky. I'm quite interested in pursuing this. I've been following wine for a long time, but I've never worked on the code. How hard is it likely to be for me, a wine newbie, to patch for icon alpha support? Joel On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 21:36 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: > The Ubuntu Studio logos look fine. > I'd be happy with adopting them if they really make Wine > fit in better with modern desktops. No need to wait for 1.2, > just check 'em in now, 1.2 will be along soon enough. > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
