On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:34:04AM +0200, Paul Vriens wrote: > Huw Davies wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:22:29AM +0200, Paul Vriens wrote: >>> Huw Davies wrote: >>>> --- >>>> dlls/user32/tests/clipboard.c | 7 +++++-- >>>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>> Was just about to sent a patch along those lines. >>> >>> Isn't it better to mark that win9x (and winME as well btw) one as broken()? >> >> I was debating with myself whether to mark it as broken or not. My >> feeling was that it's not actually broken behaviour rather missing >> functionality. But I don't really care. >> >> Huw. > > Maybe it's not broken() behavior but marking it as broken() makes sure > we (Wine) will have CF_UNICODETEXT. Without that broken(), > CF_UNICODETEXT can go missing without us knowing.
Yeah, fair enough. I guess the point is it's broken behaviour for Wine. I'll resend, thanks. Huw.