Rein Klazes wrote:
test case for bug #18102
---
dlls/user32/tests/scroll.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/user32/tests/scroll.c b/dlls/user32/tests/scroll.c
index 4f602c2..5cf3fcd 100644
--- a/dlls/user32/tests/scroll.c
+++ b/dlls/user32/tests/scroll.c
@@ -220,6 +220,130 @@ static void scrollbar_test_track(void)
ok( IsWindow( hScroll), "Scrollbar has gone!\n");
}
+/* some tests designed to show that Horizontal and Vertical
+ * window scroll bar info are not created independently */
+static void scrollbar_test_default( DWORD style)
+{
+ INT min, max, ret;
+ HWND hwnd;
+ SCROLLINFO si = { sizeof( SCROLLINFO), SIF_TRACKPOS };
+
+ hwnd = CreateWindowExA( 0, "static", "", WS_POPUP | style,
+ 0, 0, 10, 10, 0, 0, 0, NULL);
+ assert( hwnd != 0);
+
+ ret = GetScrollRange( hwnd, SB_VERT, &min, &max);
+ ok( ret ||
+ broken( !ret) /* Win 98/ME */
+ , "GetScrollRange failed.\n");
No comments on the patch as I don't know enough of this stuff. The comma
at the start of a new line looks strange though (couple of these in the
patch).
+ scrollbar_test_default( 0);
+if( 0) { /* enable this when the todo's in scrollbar_test_default are fixed */
+ scrollbar_test_default( WS_HSCROLL);
+ scrollbar_test_default( WS_VSCROLL);
+ scrollbar_test_default( WS_HSCROLL | WS_VSCROLL);
+}
Does Wine crash on these?
--
Cheers,
Paul.
