On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 03:39:07PM +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Paul Vriens <paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com> writes: > > > I don't think this is correct. This test has always succeeded until > > March 9th. There haven't been any changes to the test in that period, > > but I remember an upgrade of winehq in that weekend. > > > > In other words, there is more to it. Testing a simple cross compiled > > version of this test doesn't yield an error on NT4. > > My feeling is that it's returning uninitialized data, so the results > depend on the stack layout that the compiler is using. There's probably > no sense in checking for a specific value, just consider this case > broken no matter what it returns.
Ok, I'll resend without the test on the returned value. Huw.
