Hi! I still need help on this case, any advice is appreciated.
2009/4/25 Igor Tarasov <tarasov.i...@gmail.com>: > Hi! > > I've found few visual glitches in comctl32/toolbar, and now try to > write this all down as conformance tests, but I have some problems. I > see that there is bug, when I test it with control spy. But when I > repeat it in testcase, it won't work. Here is how you can reproduce > it: > > TB_SETBITMAPSIZE 20,20 > TB_SETBUTTONSIZE 30,30 > TB_SETBITMAPSIZE 10,10 > > Now, if you do TB_SETBUTTONSIZE, you'll see the difference. builtin > comctl will return 17,16. Native - 30,16. But when I write something > like this: > > rebuild_toolbar_with_buttons(&hToolbar); > himl = ImageList_LoadImage(GetModuleHandle(NULL), > MAKEINTRESOURCE(IDB_BITMAP_80x15), 20, 2, CLR_NONE, IMAGE_BITMAP, > LR_DEFAULTCOLOR); > ok(SendMessageA(hToolbar, TB_SETIMAGELIST, 0, (LRESULT)himl) == 0, > "TB_SETIMAGELIST failed\n"); > SendMessageA(hToolbar, TB_SETBITMAPSIZE, 0, MAKELONG(20, 20)); > SendMessageA(hToolbar, TB_SETBUTTONSIZE, 0, MAKELONG(30, 30)); > ok(SendMessageA(hToolbar, TB_GETBUTTONSIZE, 0, 0) == MAKELONG(30, > 30), "Unexpected button size\n"); > SendMessageA(hToolbar, TB_SETBITMAPSIZE, 0, MAKELONG(10, 10)); > compare((int)SendMessageA(hToolbar, TB_GETBUTTONSIZE, 0, 0), > MAKELONG(30, 16), "%x"); > > This test fails, when I test it with native comctl32 (the size is > 17,16). Why could this happen or what am I doing wrong? -- Igor