On Friday 19 June 2009 10:21:33 am Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Steven Edwards <winehac...@gmail.com> writes: > > I don't think this change is right. It is a very common convention to > > use mingw32 as a generic convention for 32bit x86. It seems the best > > practice would be if mingw32 is passed then to assume a sensible > > lowest common default. > > This is not a configure option, it's the name of the installed mingw32 > binaries. They are supposed to follow the GNU naming convention for > cross-compilers, and they do on all sane distros AFAIK.
Gentoo names them with the mingw32- prefix only, on my 32-bit x86 install.