Roderick Colenbrander wrote: > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Markus Stockhausen > <markus.stockhau...@collogia.de> wrote: >> Am Freitag, den 09.10.2009, 14:15 +0200 schrieb Paul Vriens: >> >>> If that sz99 (or now sz128) came from "looking at internal behaviour", >>> I'm not sure if that would raise some eyebrows. >>> >> As I said "looking at internal behaviour" are debugging messages in the >> IMalloc routines of ifs.c. Simply something you cannot catch when >> writing testcases only. >> > > Blackbox reverse engineering is feeding test input to a function and > looking at the output. A trace of calls made by the native MS dll > while looking under Wine isn't blackbox. It is considered about the > same as looking at disassembled Microsoft code. > > I'm not sure how to proceed from this though. He probably can still write the test case; I really doubt that Alexandre will accept a patch to fix the issue. Somebody else would have to do it based on Markus' description.
bye michael