Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> writes: > How to fix this? > > Should dlls/winex11.drv just not be built in such a case? Should > configure error out? (We do have --without-x, too, though.) Anything > else? > > Currently we do pass configure and then run into a compile failure > later on.
It's definitely supposed to fail in configure. That's handled by the standard autoconf built-in check for X. Please try to figure out why it doesn't catch that case. -- Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org
