On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Seth Shelnutt <shelnu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> It's harder than it sounds to actually get >> a few useful app tests written. Plus there'll >> be some work writing up and fixing the bugs >> it uncovers. > > So then do you think it's a worthy proposal to just work on wpkg scripts? I > have no problem working on this, and writting up/trying to fix bugs that are > uncovered. I just didn't think that by itself it would be good enough to be > accepted as a GSoC project.
I think it's enough, especially if you do one or two ahead of time and demonstrate that the process actually works. It helps to have a wine patch under your belt, too. >> Arjun Comar is going to propose something similar, but using Buildbot >> as the point of integration. > > I look forward to seeing his proposal. Will he be bring patchwatcher back to > life, but in buildbot form? I think he's starting with just getting a buildbot working, then adding a trybot with a manual upload. Patchwatcher integration would be a plus, but its mailing list watcher is fragile and needs rewriting. (Maybe you could do that little bit.) Arjun, are you ready to post a proposal? - Dan