On 14 March 2010 10:03, Roderick Colenbrander <thunderbir...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Scott Ritchie <sc...@open-vote.org> wrote: >> On 03/12/2010 11:01 AM, André Hentschel wrote: >>> >>> Hi Folks, >>> As we are getting somehow closer to Wine 1.2 i wonder how important >>> updates on the Documentation are. >>> Further i am confused about sending patches, should they just change the >>> git-repo "docs" or the pages on the website or both? >>> >> >> The website pages are supposed to be automatically generated from the docs >> every release. So patch the docs themselves. >> >> Not sure if this process still works though. >> >> Thanks, >> Scott Ritchie >> > > I thought the plans were to attempt to move all documentation (in an > updated form) to the Wiki. We would then need some mechanism to create > documentation out of the wiki. Myself I rather update the wiki when I > encounter an issue than that I update the old docs. > > Roderick > > >
While on the subject of documentation... would it be a good idea to begin documenting functions with something like Doxygen or similar? I'm just wondering if we could be building our own, much more accurate, MSDN. Is there a reason that Wine isn't documented in this way? Luke.