Le 9 avril 2010 13:30, Frédéric Delanoy <frederic.dela...@gmail.com> a écrit : > 2010/4/9 Nicolas Le Cam <niko.le...@gmail.com>: >> Hi Frédéric, >> >>>+processus clients se sont terminés. Ceci évite le coût inhérent à l'arrêt >> sont -> soient >> >>>+\fIwineserver\fR dans le chemin système ou quelques autres emplacements >>>vraisemblables. >> "potentiels" or "possibles" suit better. >> > > My understanding was that it looked first in the system path, then > tried in, e.g., the home dir or other > directories. > I guess it looks in a hardcoded list of dirs, or sthg like that. In > that sense, "possibles" does not fit IMO. > "potentiels" or "vraisemblables" could both fit, but I wanted to > insist on the probability for the command > to be there (sthg like P[potentiels] < P[vraisemblables]). > > Frédéric > It tries PATH and BINDIR (and server/wineserver if in a build directory). See http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=blob;f=libs/wine/config.c#l480 So 'potentiels' or 'possibles' fit better IMHO.
-- Nicolas Le Cam