On Sat, 24 Apr 2010, Nikolay Sivov wrote: >> ChangeLog: >> Remove variable res which is not really used from test_XcvClosePort. > We should better test for return value than remove it.
Okay. Is this something you can look into (or do you have a hint on how you'd like such a test to look like)? It would be great could you make this change, but if you have guidance I will do my best to give it a try, too. Gerald